Jump to content

Nazarov 1st MRB

Private First Class
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    78

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Nazarov 1st MRB

  1. Left 4 Dead 2

    in Other Games

    Posted · Edited by Nazarov 1st MRB

    16 hours ago, Yoder 1st MRB said:

    umm, I have to make time for my girl... I will come home from work Wednesday to find my computer burnt and smoking in the driveway, and I just bought it! 

     

    You will be missing out...it is going to be the most epic night of L4D2 ever.

     

    Single for life, baby! Last week, I played hockey 6 nights out of 7, came home and played games. Work sucked though.

     

    Everyone meet in Discord at 9 PM EST if you want to play. BE THERE

  8. Post-birth abortion

    in Politics?

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Landgren 1st MRB said:

    Which is why at birth, if the mother AND father don't want to keep the baby, the baby should be given to a couple that does want them. There should be a registry of couples that would be willing to take a baby should the parents not decide to keep them. 

     

    Registry and adoption costs administrative fees. Easier to delete than manage. I am not saying I like it, but I am just imagining that is how impersonal government body would view things.

  9. Request Perma-Mute:: .:₪сนҲ:.Drunken Master

    in Day of Defeat: Source

    Posted · Edited by Nazarov 1st MRB

    Name: .:₪сนҲ:.Drunken Master

     

    Steam I.D: U:1:45731853

    Recommended Duration of Mute/Gag/Silence: 1 year

    Reasons for the Mute/Gag/Silence: Being disrespectful to other players, instigating arguments, talking about Russias greatness, and agitating people, and drunk singing (really bad) on the mic 

    Witnesses present?: Y, TSgt. Landgren had to mute him previously.

     

    Comments: Really unpleasant to listen to.

  10. Post-birth abortion

    in Politics?

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Landgren 1st MRB said:

    Honestly, I think it should be considered murder. As after birth the baby is a human being. Even the liberals can't say that the baby isn't a person after being birthed. To kill the baby outside of the womb after birth should carry the same penalties as murder. 

     

    I agree, and why is it solely up to the mother? This makes no common sense to me, but again, state pays less to these people by this action. If the mother doesnt intend on raising the baby, then the baby will be abandoned at some point or will not have a great life.

    If the mother chooses to abort after birth, then that individual should be neutered for it. 

  11. Post-birth abortion

    in Politics?

    Posted

    9 hours ago, MacArthur BAR said:

    I have heard an argument like this with regards to homosexualism being natures way of maintaining equilibrium since there is no natural procreation in homosexual couples.

     

     

    I would be skeptical of any depopulation schemes.

     

    I dont believe in genes naturally selecting homosexualism as a way of limiting population or for environmental concerns. 

     

    I am neutral about the depopulation schemes. COVID-19 can be a part of that effort for all I know. What I believe in is that everything is driven by money and power. Withholding care means less expense, which benefits the state. Everyone is expandable, and I think the government works on this basis. A newborn contributes nothing to state taxes and will not do so for at least 30 years that is of any significance. Economically, it is more efficient to delete them, until of course the population drops. My guess is that there are still plenty of people who are  giving birth so again, no losses from the state perspective.

  12. Post-birth abortion

    in Politics?

    Posted · Edited by Nazarov 1st MRB

    Yes, but more of a prophylaxis against the inevitable human degeneration. I really wonder what percentage of humans are "good" and "productive". The current society encourages deceptive practices to get ahead, because nothing stops from the egocentric people from breaking the social norms and conceptual construct of these sets of expectations to achieve personal success. So more and more of these people will be in charge, accelerating the degeneration. Therefore, preventing the perpetuation of these kinds of people would be beneficial in my opinion--it is of course a generalized approach to the situation because again I do not know the proportion of people who behave this way. Not to mention the group mentality when it comes to things of this sort.

     

    The government and laws have lost the sight of their true purpose, which is to protect the people. My expectation is that the government will do what is right for itself, which in turn in its thought process, will benefit the people under its protection.  If the birthrate goes down to a certain point, I think you will see more laws against abortion.

  13. Post-birth abortion

    in Politics?

    Posted

    I have no interest in political aspect of things. I find it very repulsive. Instead, I give you my thoughts.

     

    In principle, I am against the concept of abortion. The purpose of coitus is to reproduce and give birth, not recreation. I believe homo sapiens should have higher level of discipline and thoughtfulness in their actions.

     

    But then again, people are just simple primitives who can verbalize their thoughts. I also believe that homo sapiens is largely a misnomer and quite biased because who would name themselves homo sophomore.

     

    It comes down to level of wisdom, which is almost a dead concept now--everyone is for personal importance and personal preferences. So it is not too bad to have these abortions, which will minimize the stupidity and human aggression in the world. The earth might be uninhabitable for mankind in the near future, so why not start now?

     

    I lost faith in the Supreme Court the minute I heard that they passed the law that corporations are persons. I just want to live the span of life and gtfo.

  15. Ban Request :: ggg

    in Day of Defeat: Source

    Posted

    Name: ggg/□□□□

    Steam I.D: U:1:1392923588

    Reasons for the Ban: Comes in and out of the server shouting the N word at the highest volume, hanging as spectator

    Recommended duration of ban: 3 days to perm

    Demo Provided?: Y/N

     

    Pfc. Smith was there too

  21. Ban Request :: svullo

    in Day of Defeat: Source

    Posted

    Name: svullo
    Steam I.D: STEAM_0:1:649249920

    Reasons for the Ban: 4-5 team killing intentionally with MG

    Recommended duration of ban: permanent ban. He is a repeat offender, and has been banned before for this exact behavior. He has also done this on 3te server

    Demo Provided?: No. Glassjaw was present in the server

  24. Ban Request :: velvitabeats

    in Day of Defeat: Source

    Posted · Edited by N. Garcia 1st MRB

    Name: velvitabeats

    Steam I.D: #    904 "velvitabeats"      [U:1:101025134]     08:59       96    0 active

    Reasons for the Ban: teamwounding intentionally in and out of base, which turned into a full blown team killing by the masses.

    Recommended duration of ban: 2 days

    Demo Provided?: N

×
×
  • Create New...