Deadliest Warrior!

[Mamora BAR]

Its back! and tonights episode is gonna be amazing. Napoleon Bonaparte vs George Washington. Im leaning towards Napoleon even though i want George washington to win. Who else is watching!?!??! Im sure this season is going to be amazing!!

[Cribari]

i have to say George Washington is going to win

[McKenzie 1st MRB]

Despite popular belief, in his early military days, George Washington was a pretty big fuck up. The only reason he won as a General was because he had smart officers who did the shit to make shit happen. It wasn't him.

[Mamora BAR]

I agree with McKenzie. I will be uber surprised if Napoleon doesnt take this by a land slide.

[Jensen]

Napoléon, of course.

[Mamora BAR]

Washington won...

[Cribari]

told you he was gonna win...

[Mamora BAR]

i hate to say it but this episode seemed really biased. All they complained about was how Napoleon failed in Russia. They never took into consideration how many battles Washington lost if their gonna keep bitching just about napoleons defeat......accurate historical facts ftw.

[McKenzie 1st MRB]

Personally I think it is stupid to pit two commanders against each other, in a heated combat situation. It should be one on one or at the very most 5 on 5 squad battles (for the SEALS v IDF etc.). Using Generals as any potrayal of a "warrior" is like saying a Fisher Price Squeaky Hammer is a portrayal of a DeWalt Sledgehammer.

[Englebretson 1st MRB]

This show has always been biased and I have never liked that but it is still a fun and cool show to watch.

[Mamora BAR]

completely agree engle. I enjoy watching it no doubt but i do feel a huge bias at times. Like when that indian tribe defeated the Mongols....what the ever fucking hell. That i will never understand.

[Zombie BAR]

Well Washington managed to keep his army together through the worst parts of the war (Which he learned to do in the French and Indian wars), and managed to gain American independence. Napoleon couldnt fight a campaign in egypt, managed to lose his army by invading Russia, and then lost the new army he created at Waterloo.

[Kirkendall 1st MRB]

It is not the business of generals to shoot one another.

I feel like they should've done a more conclusive test regarding actual armies on the field. Since then the differences in the General's logistical skills would've been significant. When you have a 5v5 logistics and most of the other general attributes they assigned seemed very mute.

Then again when has this show ever made sense? Pirate beats Knight my ass.

[Mamora BAR]

i agree kirkendall. This special case should have been handled with a more....strategic touch? The X factors they brought in were useless because like you said they were just 5 man squads. Now if it was army vs army THEN the X factors wouldve been more significant. Yes we know that napoleon failed at times, yes we know washington became victorious BUT the entire show all they complained about was Napoleons defeat in russia. Not once did i ever hear about Washingtons defeats at...or the fact that victory was barely achieved in the long run. It doesnt matter what Napoleon and you can keep listing all his defeats all you want, but the matter of fact is the show ignored Washingtons folly's and defeats and therefore made a majority of the statistics bias making it seem like omg washingtons tactics were fanfreakin tastic when in fact he was on his heels the entire revolutionary war and suffered many defeats before he started actually WINNING.

If their gonna bitch and moan about Napoleons defeats then they shouldve took into account Washingtons defeats as well.

Edited July 21, 2011 by Mamora BAR