Ban (?):: Pfc. Warren [506th PIR]

[Takel 1st MRB]

Name: Pfc. Warren [506th PIR]

Steam I.D: STEAM_0:1:9696430

Reasons for the Ban: Wallhack (possibly)

Recommended duration of ban: permanent if proved

Demo Provided?: Y

http://www.mediafire.com/?b9uicp92zo2f22e demo 1

http://www.mediafire.com/?b9uicp92zo2f22e demo 2 (don't know how useful this is)

Other Comments: Unsure of this, talked to elf and jones. Warren had an extremely high k/d ratio so we decided to spec him.

k/d at time of arising suspicions: 88/25

Edited April 5, 2011 by Takel 1st MRB

[Kirkendall 1st MRB]

You posted the same two links to the same demo. Under review.

[Takel 1st MRB]

You posted the same two links to the same demo. Under review.

damn, sorry, i'll try to fix it now

http://www.mediafire.com/?l8ptor6lb1e3efx demo 2

i tried editing the original post but it still posted the first URL twice

Edited April 5, 2011 by Takel 1st MRB

[Mamora BAR]

I have also had sketchy run ins with a few 506th PIR. Although, i do not have my own videos to back it up. Nonetheless i do support a review of this for clarification.

[Kirkendall 1st MRB]

After reviewing both demos presented, there will be no action taken on Pfc. Warren. The demos show no evidence of illegitimate play, and there is plenty of reasonable doubt to show he is just playing normally. If there is a specific point in the demos you have an issue with please bring it to my attention, otherwise I feel as though there is absolutely no reason to take action against this player. I appreciate you being attentive to the possibility of a hacker, but he is not hacking.

[Takel 1st MRB]

After reviewing both demos presented, there will be no action taken on Pfc. Warren. The demos show no evidence of illegitimate play, and there is plenty of reasonable doubt to show he is just playing normally. If there is a specific point in the demos you have an issue with please bring it to my attention, otherwise I feel as though there is absolutely no reason to take action against this player. I appreciate you being attentive to the possibility of a hacker, but he is not hacking.

Thanks, I wasn't too sure myself but figured i'd post anyway as you guys have better eyes for these things. There were a few parts (like with the MG set up in the crack facing 2nd Axis) where i felt may have been suspicious but i realise that it's not hard to guess where someone will be if allies have taken that flag. (avalanche is the map, i think?)

Thanks for your time Sir.